Showing posts with label LSM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LSM. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Today was quite the busy today. We posted two notes this morning. One post was in support of Israel in the Flotilla fighting over the weekend.We went a little bit rogue and shared it with the Weekly Standard first. Hey, VP Hair Plugs, just so you know, you can't get a Flotilla at a Mexican restaurant. So while the LSM wants to hide parts of the story, Madame simply wants to get the truth out their about the true intentions of some of these people.

It's sort of ironic that the same morning Madame supports Israel, our new neighbor, Joe McCreep, spews some nonsense to Matt Lousy about Madame acting like a Nazi. Of course, Madame had to respond, especially since NBC did not include hers and First Dude's responses as they had promised. The LSM was particularly lame today.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010



Well, the LSM is at it again. This time they are up in arms over some of Madame's requests for when she speaks. For one, when we go on a speaking engagement, Madame asks for bendable straws and water bottles! Oh the horrors! I always knew the media grasped at straws when it came to the bosswoman, but now they're doing it literally!

Also, they have become wee-weed up over the fact that when we travel first class or we would like a private jet. Hey, sometimes I need the extra room! I think the LSM is actually more surprised that she doesn't travel on a broom complete with a pointed hat or via a helicopter toting a gun to shoot unsuspecting wolves.

Another day, another nontroversy. Sigh.

Monday, April 12, 2010

I was scanning the LSM websites today, and lo and behold, the Washington Compost, as that Great American, Mark Levin calls it, has a whole article dedicated to criticizing Madame's sarcasm! What?! In addition to Madame's effective criticism of the Opologizer's administration, her sarcasm is my favorite part of our work. The "author" says:

Sarcasm rarely plays well in politics -- particularly among the independent voters who typically decide elections. It's why naturally sarcastic pols -- President Obama among them -- largely avoid any wise-cracking in public.

Palin seems to be pursuing a different path -- growing more rather than less sarcastic the longer she spends on the national stage. (Remember that Palin's first ever major speech -- at the 2008 Republican National Convention -- showed glimpses of a sarcastic Palin but by and large was a study in earnestness.)

Palin's sarcasm strategy will almost certainly affirm to some within the party's base that she is their most able combatant against Obama. But, for others -- Republicans and independents alike -- it's likely to sow some doubts about whether she is up to the task of governing if she is elected to the nation's top office.

...

For Palin to move beyond her comfort zone of Republican base politics and into ground as a serious candidate for president in 2012, she will almost certainly have to significantly scale down the sarcasm in her speeches.


Yes, Madame often is sarcastic in her speeches and elsewhere. However, she is often quite serious and pointed when she contributes on Fox, and she balances her sarcasm with substance quite well in her speeches and well as our Facebook posts! This is one area where Madame is not conservative, but moderate-- in her use of sarcasm. However, this author doesn't always seem to get it. Back in the day, before Madame was John McCain's VP pick, Cillizza interviewed Madame. I don't think she expected McAnonymous to pick her at the time, but Cillizza made a mistake when he dissed Alaska, check out Madame's expression at the 2:30ish mark of the video linked here.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

An Arctic "Cross Hare"

Well, the LSM and softy southpaws is all up in arms (pun intended) about Madame's Facebook post from yesterday where she put crosshairs on Congressional districts that she was targeting for conservatives to win back from Softy Southpaws who voted for Obamacare. These people are getting wee-weed up for no reason. She was simply saying that she was aiming, completely non-violently, at districts to help conservatives take back Congress. However, they claimed she was inciting violence. I've dug up a JPEG for your consideration as to whether or not they are inciting violence:

The President is shooting a basketball.
Is he inciting violence?



Also, Mittens Pomade's book made the top of the best sellers' list. However, if you check out the link, you can see that his book title has a dagger next to it because he sold his book in bulk; Madame didn't need to do this to make her book reach number one. Was Mittens inciting violence because of the daggers?

I don't get what's up with the LSM. Madame would never incite or condone violence, as you can see on her appearance on Uncle Glenn's show last week. Madame said violence is not the answer, voting is. Gee, and what was she asking people to do when targeting these districts? Vote!



Monday, March 8, 2010

I've just returned from the bowels of the internet, and I'm feeling quite icky! I need to do a virus scan STAT! Apparently, the HuffPo has been running a story about Madame's speech in Canada on Saturday (click on the link at your own risk). They claim that since the Heaths went to Canada so that Madame's brother could receive treatment for a burn, that must mean that Madame supports socialized medicine. The LSM has really lost it now. In summary, Madame is smart, but she didn't have political opinions on health care policy when she was a young child. Also, her brother couldn't have received socialized health care because it didn't exist at that time in Canada, and when it did exist, it was only available to residents. Geesh!

However, I must say that I could very easily write a piece for the HuffPo using a JPEG of a cute, young Sarah eating a sandwich that I have saved on my hard drive . I don't want to give the crazies any ideas, but I think I'd like to pose as a HuffPo "journalist" for a moment:


Apparently, not only did the Heath family utilize universal health care from Canada, they also received government rationed food from the USSR. As you can see in the picture below, a young Sarah Heath is eating a sandwich. But that's not just any sandwich. That bread came from the USSR. Since you can see the USSR from anywhere in Alaska, it must take no time to travel there. So, the Heath family, rather than go to the store or bake their own bread, went to the USSR to stand in line for hours and hours to get their government rationed loaf of bread all so little Sarah could eat this sandwich.


Wow. I feel so dirty stooping so low and lying so much. Shame on me for even pretending.

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

We're here in Hawaii, and the LSM and TMZ are wanting to focus on the visor that Madame wore on the beach today. Darn paparazzi. Sigh. I'm just a bit disappointed Madame took the BOTUS to the beach and not me. Oh well.

I'd like to focus on a non-paparazzi picture that I ran across here while surfing (the web, not the ocean) today.


This JPEG hearkens back to the days of Rosie the Riveter. Plus, it's cool that the BOTUS is in the picture. If you look closely, the phrase "death panel' is on the BOTUS. Then, of course, there is the "reading material". Madame is stomping on Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, and she has the Bible and what appears to perhaps be the Constitution in her pocket. Take a look at the picture to see the other gems that lie there.