RSS Feed
Twitter
9:35 PM
nintendo
Oh, I know I am going to piss off quite a few women with this concept.
Men who "father" children should be given an option to be considered sperm donors!
I came across this website regarding deadbeat baby daddies. Just do a search; there are quite a few angry women out there who aren't getting their state-sanctioned handouts from the men who impregnated them. I understand, agree, and sympathize with many of those women because they were in loving relationships. They were with guys who basically played the role of a good man, were persuaded and subsequently hoodwinked and bamboozled.
Personally, I feel men like that are in the same position as rapists. They sneak up on unsuspecting women and take advantage of them. What's the difference between that man taking his time to take advantage or just taking it forcibly right then and there. Should a con man keep $50,000 he swindled from an old lady over a thief who snatched a purse for $20? It's the same thing! The process doesn't make it different.
So enough of being on the woman's side because it's not all the man's fault.There are some women out there that I call predator bitches. They will do whatever they can to get and trap that man with a baby.
The most notable, and extreme, examples are the ones that occur with sports figures or rich men in general. They are the most chased after commodity. We've heard the stories. These women just won't quit. They're the ones that plan and plot, get through security, and make it to that guy. Then you've got the regular guys who have good jobs. They don't make mistakes until one is made for them in the form of hole poked in a condom or the customary lie, "I am on the pill!" Finally, you have the casual encounters and one-night stands. No one wants to have a baby but people just don't learn!
So, all is said and done and the baby is here. The "father" doesn't want to be a father. He never wanted to have a baby and even if he did, he didn't want one with a predator bitch. What are his rights when the woman has complete control? Exactly. Complete control means he has NO RIGHTS. I think that ought to change.
Just as women have the right to have the baby, men should have the right to NOT have the baby. I don't mean women should be forced into having abortions or to even be forced to have that baby. I am pro-choice. But, my pro-choice stance includes the rights of the "'father" to NOT be responsible for that child.
Think of it like this. There are thousands of women, single women, that pay thousands of dollars for artificial insemination. This means that they've chosen to have a baby without a man. Where are the men's rights in all of this? Signed away when they gave their sample. They get paid $50, more or less, to give some sperm. Then some doctor gets all the money, thank you's, and glory. And the women don't go chasing the man down for his identity or child support payments.
So, I wonder, when it comes to having a child, what's so different about a one-night stand between two random strangers? What's so different between some NBA star giving his sperm to some predator bitch? Is there some sort of rule that states if there are no doctors involved then the man, if identified, has to be a father to that child, at least in the form of child support payments. Absolutely not.
NO, NO, and NO! There is no difference. If the woman wants to have the baby, that's her choice. I feel that if, and only if, a man and woman are in a loving relationship and they both have agreed to have a child, the man should maintain his responsibility in perpetuity (that means forever). If the man doesn't want to be involved, that SHOULD be his choice and he should not be forced to have any involvement.
In fact, I think men, of specific stature - sports star, handsome celebrity, intellectual - ought to be paid for their services as a sperm donor to a woman who's willing to bear his children. There should be a minimum fee for the sperm alone plus insemination costs if conception occurs. Women who get to bear those children ought to be proud to have that good stock in their gene pool.
I also believe that if such laws were passed, there'd be a lot less predator bitches out there hunting down rich men. There would definitely be a lot less children being born as women would realize that the chances of a man sticking around were truly next to zero. Predator bitches would have to GET A JOB. And, all of those other women would have to be a bit smarter with who they have sex with. At the end of the day, the woman holds the access and she should be smarter with whom she gives access.
If a man has chosen to declare himself a sperm donor, he should STAY that way. If you don't want to be a father, don't come back 20 - 25 years later because you've found out your son or daughter has become a multimillionaire or you need some bone marrow. No! You wanted to be a stranger, STAY A STRANGER.
On a final note, it's not the children's fault. He or she is an innocent victim of circumstances and ought to have full access to the truth of their situation. If the truth is that your mother was a predator bitch chasing after some major league baseball player, then his mother should say, "My child, I was a predator bitch!" Don't badmouth a man to anyone for not living up to your own twisted perception. You weren't used or misled into believing anything. You did all the dirty work.
Men who "father" children should be given an option to be considered sperm donors!
I came across this website regarding deadbeat baby daddies. Just do a search; there are quite a few angry women out there who aren't getting their state-sanctioned handouts from the men who impregnated them. I understand, agree, and sympathize with many of those women because they were in loving relationships. They were with guys who basically played the role of a good man, were persuaded and subsequently hoodwinked and bamboozled.
Personally, I feel men like that are in the same position as rapists. They sneak up on unsuspecting women and take advantage of them. What's the difference between that man taking his time to take advantage or just taking it forcibly right then and there. Should a con man keep $50,000 he swindled from an old lady over a thief who snatched a purse for $20? It's the same thing! The process doesn't make it different.
So enough of being on the woman's side because it's not all the man's fault.There are some women out there that I call predator bitches. They will do whatever they can to get and trap that man with a baby.
The most notable, and extreme, examples are the ones that occur with sports figures or rich men in general. They are the most chased after commodity. We've heard the stories. These women just won't quit. They're the ones that plan and plot, get through security, and make it to that guy. Then you've got the regular guys who have good jobs. They don't make mistakes until one is made for them in the form of hole poked in a condom or the customary lie, "I am on the pill!" Finally, you have the casual encounters and one-night stands. No one wants to have a baby but people just don't learn!
So, all is said and done and the baby is here. The "father" doesn't want to be a father. He never wanted to have a baby and even if he did, he didn't want one with a predator bitch. What are his rights when the woman has complete control? Exactly. Complete control means he has NO RIGHTS. I think that ought to change.
Just as women have the right to have the baby, men should have the right to NOT have the baby. I don't mean women should be forced into having abortions or to even be forced to have that baby. I am pro-choice. But, my pro-choice stance includes the rights of the "'father" to NOT be responsible for that child.
Think of it like this. There are thousands of women, single women, that pay thousands of dollars for artificial insemination. This means that they've chosen to have a baby without a man. Where are the men's rights in all of this? Signed away when they gave their sample. They get paid $50, more or less, to give some sperm. Then some doctor gets all the money, thank you's, and glory. And the women don't go chasing the man down for his identity or child support payments.
So, I wonder, when it comes to having a child, what's so different about a one-night stand between two random strangers? What's so different between some NBA star giving his sperm to some predator bitch? Is there some sort of rule that states if there are no doctors involved then the man, if identified, has to be a father to that child, at least in the form of child support payments. Absolutely not.
NO, NO, and NO! There is no difference. If the woman wants to have the baby, that's her choice. I feel that if, and only if, a man and woman are in a loving relationship and they both have agreed to have a child, the man should maintain his responsibility in perpetuity (that means forever). If the man doesn't want to be involved, that SHOULD be his choice and he should not be forced to have any involvement.
In fact, I think men, of specific stature - sports star, handsome celebrity, intellectual - ought to be paid for their services as a sperm donor to a woman who's willing to bear his children. There should be a minimum fee for the sperm alone plus insemination costs if conception occurs. Women who get to bear those children ought to be proud to have that good stock in their gene pool.
I also believe that if such laws were passed, there'd be a lot less predator bitches out there hunting down rich men. There would definitely be a lot less children being born as women would realize that the chances of a man sticking around were truly next to zero. Predator bitches would have to GET A JOB. And, all of those other women would have to be a bit smarter with who they have sex with. At the end of the day, the woman holds the access and she should be smarter with whom she gives access.
If a man has chosen to declare himself a sperm donor, he should STAY that way. If you don't want to be a father, don't come back 20 - 25 years later because you've found out your son or daughter has become a multimillionaire or you need some bone marrow. No! You wanted to be a stranger, STAY A STRANGER.
On a final note, it's not the children's fault. He or she is an innocent victim of circumstances and ought to have full access to the truth of their situation. If the truth is that your mother was a predator bitch chasing after some major league baseball player, then his mother should say, "My child, I was a predator bitch!" Don't badmouth a man to anyone for not living up to your own twisted perception. You weren't used or misled into believing anything. You did all the dirty work.
Posted in 
0 comments:
Post a Comment