RSS Feed
Twitter
6:45 AM
nintendo
Before you answer lets take a look at how other nations feel.
What is the United States position? Darby Holladay of the U.S. State Department had the following to say:
"The Iranian nuclear reactor poses “no threat” to anyone's security. "We recognize that the Bushehr reactor is designed to provide civilian nuclear power and do not view it as a proliferation risk”.
"The U.S. welcomed Russia's involvement in Iran's nuclear program. Iran's reactor, “is under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) safeguards and Russia is providing the needed fuel and taking back the spent nuclear fuel, which would be the principal source of proliferation concerns.”
Ok, so let me get this straight...the United States official position is that it is safe. Furthermore what makes it more safe is the fact that Russia is providing the needed fuel AND TAKING BACK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL!! OH OK I FEEL MUCH BETTER NOW!!! WTF AMERICA?
What is the UK's position? The UK has "always respected" Iran's right to civilian nuclear power.
Let's see how they feel when one war head that is potentially nuclear goes missing.
How does Israel feel about it? "Totally Unacceptable".
At least one Nation agrees with me that it's a bad idea.
A "nuclear Iran" chalk up another "first" during the Obama administration for change. In my personal opinion it is a very bad idea to give blowhard tyrants like Ahmadinejad Nuclear capability! What do you think?
What is the United States position? Darby Holladay of the U.S. State Department had the following to say:
"The Iranian nuclear reactor poses “no threat” to anyone's security. "We recognize that the Bushehr reactor is designed to provide civilian nuclear power and do not view it as a proliferation risk”.
"The U.S. welcomed Russia's involvement in Iran's nuclear program. Iran's reactor, “is under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) safeguards and Russia is providing the needed fuel and taking back the spent nuclear fuel, which would be the principal source of proliferation concerns.”
Ok, so let me get this straight...the United States official position is that it is safe. Furthermore what makes it more safe is the fact that Russia is providing the needed fuel AND TAKING BACK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL!! OH OK I FEEL MUCH BETTER NOW!!! WTF AMERICA?
What is the UK's position? The UK has "always respected" Iran's right to civilian nuclear power.
Let's see how they feel when one war head that is potentially nuclear goes missing.
How does Israel feel about it? "Totally Unacceptable".
At least one Nation agrees with me that it's a bad idea.
A "nuclear Iran" chalk up another "first" during the Obama administration for change. In my personal opinion it is a very bad idea to give blowhard tyrants like Ahmadinejad Nuclear capability! What do you think?
Posted in 
0 comments:
Post a Comment