RSS Feed
Twitter
4:51 PM
nintendo
Wrong Court Ruled on Arizona Law
In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the State of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.
Her argument states in part, "Does anyone read the U.S.
Constitution these days? American lawyers don't read it.
Federal Judge Susan R. Boltolton apparently has never read it.
Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder.*
But this lawyer has read it, and she is going to show you
something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on
your face.
"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting
Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in
which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have
original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned,
the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."
In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no
Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she
ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S.
Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state. This means
that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
in San Francisco , to which the case is being appealed, have any
legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue. Thus, U.S.
Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's
lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no
authority to hear the case.
In a related development, another explosive discovery was made
by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The
Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war
against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion,
should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the
federal government.
From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find
these words: " No State shall, without the Consent of Congress,
engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent
Danger as will not admit of delay."
No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern
border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless
assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws,
inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills,
and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug
cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking,
and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers
directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican
border. This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation
of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.
The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in
this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself
in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal
government, including waging war in its self-defense.
This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that
only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should
be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go
after the federal government with a vengeance.
Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona
legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the
illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.
And there are established procedures by which Federal Judge
Susan R. Bolton can be removed from her position as a result of
her violating her oath of office to uphold and defend the
Constitution for the United States of America.
In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the State of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.
Her argument states in part, "Does anyone read the U.S.
Constitution these days? American lawyers don't read it.
Federal Judge Susan R. Boltolton apparently has never read it.
Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder.*
But this lawyer has read it, and she is going to show you
something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on
your face.
"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting
Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in
which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have
original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned,
the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."
In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no
Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she
ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S.
Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state. This means
that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
in San Francisco , to which the case is being appealed, have any
legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue. Thus, U.S.
Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's
lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no
authority to hear the case.
In a related development, another explosive discovery was made
by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The
Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war
against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion,
should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the
federal government.
From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find
these words: " No State shall, without the Consent of Congress,
engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent
Danger as will not admit of delay."
No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern
border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless
assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws,
inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills,
and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug
cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking,
and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers
directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican
border. This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation
of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.
The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in
this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself
in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal
government, including waging war in its self-defense.
This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that
only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should
be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go
after the federal government with a vengeance.
Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona
legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the
illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.
And there are established procedures by which Federal Judge
Susan R. Bolton can be removed from her position as a result of
her violating her oath of office to uphold and defend the
Constitution for the United States of America.
Posted in 
0 comments:
Post a Comment