THE OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE GETS MORE ASININE BY THE DAY:

THE OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE GETS MORE ASININE BY THE DAY:

As most of you know by now, Obama has a bank of lawyers whose sole responsibility is to quash any and all demands by We the People for proper documentation that Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the Oval Office. These lawyers are counting on a ruling that American citizens have no "standing" to demand that information.

In the latest brief submitted to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, the attorneys stated, "that any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain." DUH!

This particular case was brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. The defendents in the case are Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives, former Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The case alleges that Congress failed to follow the Constitution, which "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."

The government's statement will be answered by the scheduled deadline of March 22. In a statement, Kerchner said that basically, Obama's attorneys are saying that "Obama and Congress can totally ignore the U.S. Constitution and there is nothing that 'We the People' can legally do about it. Nobody has standing to right the wrong when Obama and Congress illegally violate Article II of the Constitution and seat an illegally an ineligible person as president and commander-in-chief of our vast military power."

My God, can you believe the arrogance of the buffoons in Washington, D.C. who are supposed to be working for us? WE THE PEOPLE created the federal government and we damn sure have the RIGHT to fix our totally broken and runaway federal government.

What is most telling is that the brief filed by Obama's lawyers does not even acknowledge allegations against Obama which are that he is not and cannot be an Article II 'natural born Citizen' because his father was a British subject/citizen and not a United States citizen and Obama himself was a British subject/citizen at the time Obama was born and that he has failed to even show that he is at least a 'citizen of the United States' by conclusively proving that he was born in Hawaii. This gives the appearance that the Justice Department does not want such allegations to be even included in any official court record.

Obama's father was only a temporary visitor to the United States when Obama was born and never became a resident let alone a citizen. Also, Obama has failed to prove that he was born in Hawaii by revealing his documentation. Obama did NOT post his birth certificate on his website, as he and his supporters continue to claim. What he posted was a 'certificate of live birth' which is different from a 'vault' or long-form birth certificate.

At the time of Obama's birth, Hawaii allowed parents to apply for and receive a 'certificate of live birth' for their children who were born elsewhere, including those born on foreign soil. Some of the main differences between an actual long-form (vault) birth certificate and a certificate of live birth are: A long-form birth certificate contains the name of the hospital in which the individual was born, the certificate of live birth does NOT. A long-form birth certificate contains the name of the doctor in attendance at the birth, the certificate of live birth does NOT. There is also other information that appears on a long-form birth certificate that is missing from a certificate of live birth.

Also, Obama has refused to produce his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records. If he has nothing to hide, then why is he refusing to produce these records? And why does the White House and the MSM continue to ridicule and belittle those who exercise their rights as citizens by demanding that Obama prove that he is eligible?

Since we all know that Obama and the Congress have and are violating the Constitution through unconstitutional legislation, then how are we to believe that Obama and the Congress are not violating the Constitution concerning his eligibility to be president?

Yes, I know that there are many out there who feel that those of us who want proof of Obama's eligibility to hold the office of president are nothing more then crack pots or lunatics, but as I have stated many times in the past, this IS important to ALL Americans because either we HAVE a Constitution or we DON'T, either we ARE a nation of laws or we are NOT, and either the LAW applies to EVERYONE, including our elected officials or it ONLY applies to the LITTLE GUY.

If 'We the People', as citizens of the United States do not have standing in matters concerning the possible violations of the Constitution by our elected officials, then just who the hell does?